![]() If you need a reliable and secure remote access solution, TeamViewer is definitely worth considering. I also appreciate the multi-language support, which can be helpful for users globally. Additionally, the app has been around for a long time, which speaks to its reliability and stability. While there are free alternatives available, TeamViewer's security features and file sharing capabilities make it worth considering. During my free trial, I found it to be useful for screen sharing and solving my college problems over remote access. But if remote work is a core component of your project, you simply have to manage.Ĭomments: In my experience, TeamViewer is a reliable remote access solution. It is hard for small teams to afford the tool. I guess you can use TeamViewer for calls as well, but I never figured it out as we are pretty much embedded into Slack :DĪlso the price is rather steep. While on a call it gets tangled up with the call Skype/Slack/Hangouts etc) and creates very irritating screeching noise and/or feedback. To be honest, the sound settings is a little confusing to set up. ![]() The remote access without assistance feature is especially helpful for a project manager who needs to maintain assests in separate locations. TeamViewer has proved to be the most stable tool for that. The file transfer feature works like a charm and is very secure, if you are worried about privacy.īeing a remote employee, I have to use PCs all over the world pretty frequently. ![]() This is the most stable remote access tool I have tested, and I tested an awful lot of them. Do keep in mind, to get the best out of this tool, you should have a stable network on both ends. ![]() There were some issues with network, but that is not TeamViewer's fault. In my years of use, I have only seen it fail a couple of times. Comments: This is a robust workhorse for any and all remote assistance, resource maintanance tool.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |